father denied the book

outline



Prologue



Throughout the exposit I will be making reference to public corruption with various data sets that can be found in this blog and maximusmaxedout.blogspot and lawlessfmep.blogspot. Arguably doubling the child poverty rate in a decade, in a top G-8 economy with 90% of child support paid, could be labeled as gross incompetence. However decades of an abundance of evidence clearly shows the results of forcing 10% of our children to grow up in poverty would increase crime dramatically and was well known at the time. There is a clear choice between government revenue and the children of divorce, government choose revenue. With single parent mothers leading the charge into poverty and having to cook the crime rate in 2007 they now are cooking the poverty caused from child support claw backs.


Although taxing babies seems absolutely like mass insanity is isn't anything more than revenue. No gender war, gender bias courts or deadbeat dads causing child poverty resulting in escalating crime, it isn't anything more than corruption perpetrated on the people by revenue hungry governments.


The only ideology presented by any party is 'why tax the rich when we can tax the babies. As you will see just because government wrote a law to make corruption legal does not mean it is not a crime and it is these crimes this book follows.

Chapter 1
1993. Daughter V 6 years old. Son 3 years old.
I was working 75 hrs a week Monday to Friday with another 8 to 12 on the weekend building a house for the family. The first complaint came as 'I want to go out Friday but you're not interested'. The next Friday I suggested we go out and the response was 'look at all the work I have to do'. No doubt, dirty dishes were piled so high I think they would have crashed to the floor with a loud word. I suggested next week to start on Thursday but was told, 'the kids take up too much of my time'. Ten seconds later I suggested a babysitter or house cleaning contractor on Thursday,,, one second after that. 'I don't get enough time with the kids'. I knew then trouble was a lot more than bar night on Friday.
1994. The marriage councilor.
After a year of attempting to find out what the real problem was we did three sessions. At the end of the third session the councilor asked each what the problem was. I said the lack of communication while the ex said she didn't want to talk about anything,,, and that was the advice, I was too ignore all and stay quiet. That lasted a year until she moved out, still don't know why but by then I couldn't see solving any problems.
1995. The separation agreement.
An agreement that X drafted after she moved out and was at the lawyers for finalization. It gave here 2/3 of the assets so our lawyer was shocked when she canceled it in favor of placing it before the courts. He said at the time she won't get as much through the courts so not only am I still wondering why I was saddled with court costs but more confusing is why did the courts or the lawyers proceed with a case the plaintiff would obviously come out the worse for.
1996.
Cancer
　2bcont

child support government clawback

All the recent updates at;


lawlessfmep.blogspot.ca


Dec 28 2014


close to the end of the road
I'm on a disablity pension of $1100/m.
Donations needed to persevere, can be deposited directly to


Branch 004 90560 account 6224464
TD Bank Chilliwack BC Canada

Background for a petition on behalf of the children of divorce.

lawlessfmep.blogspot.ca

No justice yet.

After the 1999 report for the sake of the children the minister of justice, under instructions from the federal justice committee, was to meet with provincial AGs to guide family court away from sole custody to lessen the trauma to the child in losing a parent. In the years that followed the courts took sole custody to historic highs. The results of what is nothing short of massive child abuse are in and just, if not worse, than predicted in the government report.

Vancouver BC. 2009 property crime capital of north america, even though only 5% of single parent children get in trouble, its 80% of youth in trouble, 80% of prison inmates etc. Double sole custody and the crime rate goes up by 80%. The following year the spike in crime attracted more gangs per capita than any other place on the planet. 2011, a dismal youth mental health report and historic child poverty. The child poverty is a result of government clawing back child support.

The governments response hasn't changed, no one did anything wrong yet refuse to address the charge of using sole custody to create government revenue by clawing back child support, on a massive scale.
http://www.vancouversun.com/news/story.html?id=8801928


Over a dozen years ago I started an internet campaign to expose the ruthless methods the Canadian government employs to increase revenue an the backs of our most vulnerable children.

For those that recall.

no justice no investment

Child support isnt for the children.

The results.
As I predicted a decade ago we will be raising a generation of homicidal youths BC hit a global gang title rate. Many have said that's close enough for a prediction.
The gangs were attracted by a north american property crime title and followed by a new child poverty record, followed by a dismal report on the mental health of our youth.
These are the results of government crafting the divorce act that has one purpose, to increase government revenue.
 The undeniable factual proof that government has placed child support as more important to the next election than to the next generation is at.

maximusmaxedout.blogspot.com

The courts are not gender bias they are tax bias.

Undeniable

The balance of evidense on the best interests of the child is now in.

maximusmaxedout.blogspot.com

Loose End

Although this goes at the end of the last thread after my name and before `the end` I`m dropping it here because the reason this issue played out like it did is corruption. This example is a prime one as I have not received a response for my request to my FMEP file.

People in authority breaking the rules and laws, abusing the authority they have.
There are tens of thousands of non-custodial parents and children with similar stories, this is not a one off or `there must have been a reason`. Abuse of power is systemic and Cdn society, the rule of law and our international sphere are paying the price.
----------

Reply sent by FMEP on March 25, 2009
Dear Robert Joseph Smith,


Your message has been received at our office and the information you provided us has been noted on your case.

Thank you.
========================

File request and reasons for request.

In 1998 FMEP lied to Free Rein in Hope. Peter asked from a reduction fro the 50% as I was just coming off a two year bout with cancer. He was told 35% would be acceptable and then entered into your letter writing campaign that told potential employers they would have to deduct 50% or face legal consequences.

Last spring FMEP requested a reason why I couldn`t pay such as income from a disability pension only. I did that but you are hitting me with the maximum allowed under law.
After these two very significant lies I request a complete copy of my files as there is every reason to believe your add-ons are lies as well.

I`m sure you can understand the distrust your actions have created and comply with my request asap.

Thank You

Robert Smith